Establishment of housing transfer inspection items using SEM: Empirical study in Taiwan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2025.25134Abstract
Disputes during the housing transfer process often lead to dissatisfaction for homeowners. This study aims to address these issues by (1) proposing a comprehensive house inspection guideline with key items and criteria, and (2) evaluating how inspection services influence homebuyers’ purchase intentions and perceived value. Based on comprehensive literature review and expert input, eight major inspection categories and 43 criteria were identified. These formed the basis for a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) framework and three hypotheses. A pilot survey with 50 participants confirmed strong reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.880–0.945). Of 500 distributed questionnaires, 206 valid responses were collected. SEM analysis showed that inspection services significantly enhance both purchase intentions and perceived value, with R² values exceeding 79% in most areas, except for environmental inspections. Building structure, water supply/drainage and water leakage are the most influential findings in shaping perceived value. These results highlight the importance of targeted inspection services in addressing homebuyer perceived value and improving the overall housing experience in Taiwan.
Keywords:
house inspection, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), perceived value, housing transferHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adekunle, P., Aigbavboa, C., Akinradewo, O., Ikuabe, M., & Otasowie, K. (2024). Towards the uptake of digital technologies for construction information management: A partial least squares structural equation modelling approach. Buildings, 14(3), Article 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030827
Ahmad, T., Stephan, A., Purwaningrum, R. D. A., Gulzar, S., De Vecchi, R., Ahmed, M., Candido, C., Sadek, A. H., & Qrayeiah, W. (2024). Practices contributing to building sustainability: Investigating opinions of architecture students using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of Building Engineering, 96, Article 110391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110391
Alhammadi, Y., Radzi, A. R., Alias, A. R., & Rahman, R. A. (2024). Modeling workplace well-being factors in infrastructure construction projects: PLS-SEM approach. Buildings, 14(8), Article 2289. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082289
Al-khatib, A. W., AL-Shboul, M. A., & Khattab, M. (2024). How can generative artificial intelligence improve digital supply chain performance in manufacturing firms? Analyzing the mediating role of innovation ambidexterity using hybrid analysis through CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. Technology in Society, 78, Article 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102676
Al-Mhdawi, M. K. S., O’Connor, A., & Qazi, A. (2024). Structural equation modeling and fuzzy set theory: Advancing risk assessment in oil and gas construction projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 109, Article 107622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107622
Astrachan, C. B., Patel, V. K., & Wanzenried, G. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.002
Becker, J. M., Cheah, J. H., Gholamzade, R., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0474
Blocker, C. P., Manning, K. C., & Trujillo, C. A. (2023). Beyond radical affordability in the base of the pyramid: The role of consumer self-confidence in product acceptance. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 57(1), 619–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12514
Cao, Y. T., Liu, R., Qi, W., & Wen, J. (2020). Urban land regulation and heterogeneity of housing conditions of inter-provincial migrants in China. Land, 9(11), Article 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110428
Chakraborty, O., Dragan, K. L., Ellen, I. G., Glied, S. A., Howland, R. E., Neill, D. B., & Wang, S. (2024). Housing-sensitive health conditions can predict poor-quality housing. Heath Affairs, 43(2), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01008
Chen, J.-H., Chou, T.-S., Wang, J.-P., & Wong, Q. R. (2024). Empirical study toward corporate legal compliance and anti-corruption for top construction engineering consulting firms. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 30(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2024.19554
Chen, J.-H., Chou, T.-S., Wang, J.-P., Wei, H.-H., & Yang, T.-H. (2021). Sustainable corporate governance: The impact factors for top consulting engineering companies in Taiwan. Sustainability, 13(14), Article 7604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147604
Chen, J.-H., Pan, H.-H., Wang, T.-K., & Wei, H.-H. (2023). Housing transfer inspection: What are the priorities? Buildings, 13(10), Article 2573. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102573
Ciunova-Shuleska, A., Osakwe, C. N., Palamidovska-Sterjadovska, N., Ogunmokun, O. A., & Adeola, O. (2024). Fostering consumer acceptance of smart glasses: The moderating role of price sensitivity. Technology Analysis and Strategy Management, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2372780
Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasts and Social Change, 173, Article 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
Demirkesen, S., Tezel, A., Uysal, F., & Ozturk, Z. (2024). Investigating the impact of blockchain on project risk management success: A structural equation model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 8356–8368. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3371057
Emaminejad, N., Kath, L., & Akhavian, R. (2024). Assessing trust in construction AI-powered collaborative robots using structural equation modeling. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 38(3), Article 04024011. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCCEE5.CPENG-5660
Förster, K. (2024). Extending the technology acceptance model and empirically testing the conceptualised consumer goods acceptance model. Heliyon, 10(6), Article e27823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27823
Goodall, Z., & Stone, W. (2024). Sharing risk in shared housing: Rental regulations and housing justice in Australia. International Journal of Housing Policy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2024.2367836
Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.03.010
Hasselwander, M., & Weiss, D. (2024). Key factors influencing consumer adoption intentions of super apps in Germany. IEEE Access, 12, 101985–101998. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3431950
Koch, I. (2018). From welfare to lawfare: Environmental suffering, neighbour disputes and the law in UK social housing. Critique Anthropology, 38(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X18758870
Konanahalli, A., Marinelli, M., & Oyedele, L. (2024). Big data value proposition in UK facilities management: A structural equation modelling approach. Buildings, 14(7), Article 2083. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072083
Korfmacher, K. S., & Holt, K. D. (2018). The potential for proactive housing inspections to inform public health interventions. Journal of Publica Health Management and Practice, 24(5), 444–447. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000757
Lau, M. (2018). Framing processes in planning disputes: Analysing dynamics of contention in a housing project in Hong Kong. Housing Studies, 33(5), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1383367
Martín, C. (2019). Understanding US housing data in relation to the 2017 disasters. Natural Hazards Review, 20(3), Article 04019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000331
Miah, M. F. (2021). Transnational land and property disputes: The British-Bangladeshi experience. Contemporary South Asia, 29(3), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2021.1886249
Mo, H. T., Liu, Y. T., & Yau, Y. (2024). Historicised exploration and middle-range theoretisation of the housing regime in urban China. International Journal of Housing Policy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2024.2308736
Nasreen, Z., & Ruming, K. J. (2021). Informality, the marginalised and regulatory inadequacies: A case study of tenants’ experiences of shared room housing in Sydney, Australia. International Journal of Housing Policy, 21(2), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2020.1803531
Qiao, X., Lee, H., Shen, Q., & Li, Y. C. (2024). Research on the quadrilateral evolutionary game of governance for small property rights housing on rural land in China. Land, 13(3), Article 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13030320
Robb, K., Amigo, N. D., Marcoux, A., McAteer, M., & de Jong, J. (2022). Using integrated city data and machine learning to identify and intervene early on housing-related public health problems. Journal of Publica Health Management and Practice, 28(2), E497–E505. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001343
Sonik, R. A., & Herrera, A. L. (2022). Associations between inspections for unsafe housing conditions and evictions in New York City public housing buildings. Journal of Community Healthy, 47(5), 849–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-022-01114-3
Suzuki, M., Kawai, K., & Shimizu, C. (2022). Discrimination against the atypical type of tenants in the Tokyo private rental housing market: Evidence from moving-in inspection and rent arrear records. Journal of Housing Economics, 58(B), Article 101879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2022.101879
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
Tan, Y., Li, S. L., & Wang, Q. (2020). Automated geometric quality inspection of prefabricated housing units using BIM and LiDAR. Remote Sensing, 12(15), Article 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152492
Taufik, D., Winter, M. A. V., & Reinders, M. J. (2023). Creating trust and consumer value for true price food products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, Article 136145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136145
Thneibat, M. (2024). Assessing the post-COVID interaction between indoor environmental quality and occupants within educational buildings: A structural equation modeling approach. Building and Environment, 255, Article 111422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111422
Waqar, A., Alharbi, L. A., Alotaibi, F. A., Othman, I., & Almujibah, H. (2024). Impediment to implementation of Internet of Things (IOT) for oil and gas construction project safety: Structural equation modeling approach. Structures, 57, Article 105324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105324
Waqar, A., Othman, I., Radu, D., Ali, Z., Almujibah, H., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., & Khan, M. B. (2023). Modeling the relation between building information modeling and the success of construction projects: A structural-equation-modeling approach. Applied Science, 13(15), Article 9018. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13159018
Wright, V. (2021). ‘Housing problems … are political dynamite’: Housing disputes in Glasgow c. 1971 to the present day. Sociological Research Online, 26(4), 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418780038
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.